|
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,
AHMEDABAD-I, CENTRAL EXCISE BHAVAN, 7TH FLOOR,
AMBAWADI, AHMEDABAD-380
015. Web: www.cenexahmedabad.nic.in Email :
cexahmed@excise.nic.in (Tel:
079-26300024, Fax:
079-26306152, C. Room: 079-26300183) |
TRADE
NOTICE NO. 16/2009
Sub: Liability of interest where CENVAT credit
was wrongly taken but reversed by assessee before utilization - Regarding.
….
A
copy of Circular No. 897/17/2009-CX dated:
02. All the Trade
Associations/Chambers of Commerce and the members of the RAC/PGRC are requested
to bring/publicise the contents of this Trade Notice amongst their
Members/Constituents for their information and necessary action.
.
(M. RAHMAN)
JOINT COMMISSIONER [TECH.]
CENTRAL
EXCISE,
AHMEDABAD-I
F.No. IV/16-01/MP/2009 Date:
Encl : As above.
Copy to : As per mailing list of Trade & Dept.
Circular No. 897/17/2009-CX
F.No.267/83/2009-CX-8
Government of
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Excise & Customs)
To,
All
Director Generals,
All
Chief Commissioners of Central Excise (including LTU),
All
Commissioners of Central Excise (including LTU).
Sir/
Madam,
Subject:
Liability of interest where CENVAT credit was wrongly taken but reversed by
assessee before utilization-reg.
Representation has been received from
the field formation stating that the decision of Hon’ble High Court of P&H
in the case of CCE, Delhi III V/s Maruti Udyog Ltd. [2007(214)ELT173(P&H)], has upheld the order of Tribunal wherein it
was held that assessee is not liable to pay interest in the case where credit was only taken and not utilized.
The SLP against this order has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. On the other
hand, Rule 14 of The CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, provides for recovery of credit
taken or utilized wrongly with interest. In view of this conflict in legal
provisions and the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court, a clarification has been
requested from the Board.
2. The
matter has been examined. It is seen that the Tribunal decision and the High
Court judgement referred to above,
was delivered in the context of erstwhile Rule 57I of the Central Excise Rules,
1944 and that the Supreme Court order under reference is only a decision and
not a judgement. Since, the Rule 14 of the CENVAT
Credit Rules, 2004, is clear and unambiguous in the position that interest would
be recoverable when CENVAT credit is taken or utilized
wrongly, it is clarified that the interest shall be recoverable when credit has
been wrongly taken, even if it has not been utilized, in terms of the wordings
of the present Rule 14.
3.
Trade & Industry as well as field formations may be
suitably informed.
4.
Receipt of this circular may kindly be
acknowledged.
5.
Hindi version will follow.
Yours faithfully,
(Amish Kumar Gupta)
OSD (CX-8)